Hybrid and multicloud secure networking architecture patterns
Stay organized with collections
Save and categorize content based on your preferences.
Last reviewed 2024-10-29 UTC
This document is the third of three documents in a set. It discusses hybrid
and multicloud networking architecture patterns. This part explores several
common secure network architecture patterns that you can use for hybrid and
multicloud architectures. It describes the scenarios that these networking
patterns are best suited for, and provides best practices for implementing them
with Google Cloud.
The document set for hybrid and multicloud architecture patterns consists of
these parts:
Hybrid and multicloud secure networking architecture patterns:
discusses hybrid and multicloud networking architecture patterns from a
networking perspective (this document).
Connecting private computing environments to Google Cloud securely and
reliably is essential for any successful hybrid and multicloud architecture.
The hybrid networking connectivity and cloud networking architecture pattern you
choose for a hybrid and multicloud setup must meet the unique requirements of
your enterprise workloads. It must also suit the architecture patterns you
intend to apply. Although you might need to tailor each design, there are common patterns you can use as a blueprint.
The networking architecture patterns in this document shouldn't be
considered alternatives to the
landing zone design in Google Cloud.
Instead, you should design and deploy the architecture patterns you
select as part of the overall Google Cloud landing zone design, which
spans the following areas:
Identities
Resource management
Security
Networking
Monitoring
Different applications can use different networking architecture patterns,
which are incorporated as part of a landing zone architecture. In a multicloud
setup, you should maintain the consistency of the landing zone design across all
environments.
[[["Easy to understand","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Solved my problem","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Other","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Hard to understand","hardToUnderstand","thumb-down"],["Incorrect information or sample code","incorrectInformationOrSampleCode","thumb-down"],["Missing the information/samples I need","missingTheInformationSamplesINeed","thumb-down"],["Other","otherDown","thumb-down"]],["Last updated 2024-10-29 UTC."],[[["\u003cp\u003eThis document focuses on secure networking architecture patterns for hybrid and multicloud environments, specifically as they relate to Google Cloud.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eIt details common patterns, their ideal use cases, and best practices for implementation within Google Cloud's ecosystem.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThe patterns discussed are designed to securely and reliably connect private computing environments to Google Cloud.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThese networking patterns should be integrated into an overarching Google Cloud landing zone design, which includes aspects like identities, security, resource management, networking, and monitoring.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eThe document is the third in a series that explores hybrid and multicloud architectures, focusing on the networking perspective, and it provides links to other related content within the series.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],[],null,["# Hybrid and multicloud secure networking architecture patterns\n\nThis document is the third of three documents in a set. It discusses hybrid\nand multicloud networking architecture patterns. This part explores several\ncommon secure network architecture patterns that you can use for hybrid and\nmulticloud architectures. It describes the scenarios that these networking\npatterns are best suited for, and provides best practices for implementing them\nwith Google Cloud.\n\nThe document set for hybrid and multicloud architecture patterns consists of\nthese parts:\n\n- [Build hybrid and multicloud architectures](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-patterns): discusses planning a strategy for architecting a hybrid and multicloud setup with Google Cloud.\n- [Hybrid and multicloud architecture patterns](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-patterns-and-practices): discusses common architecture patterns to adopt as part of a hybrid and multicloud strategy.\n- Hybrid and multicloud secure networking architecture patterns: discusses hybrid and multicloud networking architecture patterns from a networking perspective (this document).\n\nConnecting private computing environments to Google Cloud securely and\nreliably is essential for any successful hybrid and multicloud architecture.\nThe hybrid networking connectivity and cloud networking architecture pattern you\nchoose for a hybrid and multicloud setup must meet the unique requirements of\nyour enterprise workloads. It must also suit the architecture patterns you\nintend to apply. Although you might need to tailor each design, there are common patterns you can use as a blueprint.\n\nThe networking architecture patterns in this document shouldn't be\nconsidered alternatives to the\n[landing zone design in Google Cloud](/architecture/landing-zones).\nInstead, you should design and deploy the architecture patterns you\nselect as part of the overall Google Cloud landing zone design, which\nspans the following areas:\n\n- Identities\n- Resource management\n- Security\n- Networking\n- Monitoring\n\nDifferent applications can use different networking architecture patterns,\nwhich are incorporated as part of a landing zone architecture. In a multicloud\nsetup, you should maintain the consistency of the landing zone design across all\nenvironments.\n\nThis series contains the following pages:\n\n- [Design considerations](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/design-considerations)\n- [Architecture patterns](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/architecture-patterns)\n - [Mirrored pattern](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/mirrored-pattern)\n - [Meshed pattern](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/meshed-pattern)\n - [Gated patterns](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/gated-patterns)\n - [Gated egress](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/gated-egress)\n - [Gated ingress](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/gated-ingress)\n - [Gated egress and ingress](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/gated-egress-ingress)\n - [Handover](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/handover-pattern)\n- [General best practices](/architecture/hybrid-multicloud-secure-networking-patterns/general-best-practices)\n\nContributors\n------------\n\nAuthor: [Marwan Al Shawi](https://www.linkedin.com/in/marwanalshawi) \\| Partner Customer Engineer\n\nOther contributors:\n\n- [Saud Albazei](https://www.linkedin.com/in/albazei) \\| Customer Engineer, Application Modernization\n- [Anna Berenberg](https://www.linkedin.com/in/annaberenberg) \\| Engineering Fellow\n- [Marco Ferrari](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ferrarimark) \\| Cloud Solutions Architect\n- [Victor Moreno](https://www.linkedin.com/in/vimoreno) \\| Product Manager, Cloud Networking\n- [Johannes Passing](https://www.linkedin.com/in/johannespassing) \\| Cloud Solutions Architect\n- [Mark Schlagenhauf](https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-schlagenhauf-63b98) \\| Technical Writer, Networking\n- [Daniel Strebel](https://www.linkedin.com/in/danistrebel) \\| EMEA Solution Lead, Application Modernization\n- [Ammett Williams](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ammett) \\| Developer Relations Engineer\n\n\u003cbr /\u003e"]]