Modernization path for .NET Framework applications on Google Cloud

Last reviewed 2023-07-13 UTC

This document looks at the common limitations of monolithic applications and describes a gradual yet structured process for modernizing them.

This document is intended for cloud architects, system administrators, and CTOs who are familiar with Windows and the .NET ecosystem and want to learn more about what modernization involves. Although this document focuses on custom-built server applications (such as ASP.NET or Windows Services applications), you can apply the lessons to other use cases.

Legacy versus modern applications: Why modernize?

Modernizing legacy applications is a journey. Where you begin and end that journey, and what benefits you gain, largely depend on the state of your applications and the time and effort you can invest to modernize.

In the context of .NET Framework applications, the concepts of legacy and modern are not definitive. Every application has distinct legacy and modernization needs. However, legacy applications share some common limitations.

The following diagram summarizes the characteristics of legacy applications and modern cloud-based applications.

Differences between monolithic and modern cloud-based
applications.

A legacy .NET Framework application is typically a monolith that is built on the .NET Framework, hosted on an on-premises Microsoft Windows server, and connected to an on-premises server running Microsoft SQL Server. The details of your architecture might differ from these general characteristics, but most monolithic applications have the following limitations:

  • The need to manage on-premises servers running Windows and SQL Server.
  • The limited deployment environments and licensing costs associated with dependency on Windows.
  • The difficulty of upgrading legacy applications that are built on a monolithic architecture.
  • Little agility to plan, budget, and scale with on-premises resources.

Applications built for a cloud-based architecture offer several benefits:

  • Minimal management overhead by integrating with managed services.
  • Full mobility with .NET and containers and no Windows dependencies, or licensing costs.
  • A high-velocity upgrade path based on independently deployable microservices.
  • Full agility to scale and budget with a serverless architecture.

Compared to the conventional on-premises approach, a cloud architecture offers a more cost-effective, efficient, and resilient way to run your applications. In a cloud-based approach, you have more flexibility to choose where and when to deploy your applications.

Modernization path

While the benefits of a cloud-based architecture are clear, the path to the cloud might not be. Modernization from a legacy .NET Framework architecture to a cloud-based architecture does not follow a single, one-size-fits-all pattern. As the following diagram shows, modernization involves a series of steps, where each step removes a limitation, elevates application capabilities, and opens up opportunities for later phases of modernization.

Process, technologies, and services involved in the modernization
process.

The steps to modernization are grouped into three phases:

  1. Rehost in the cloud (also known as lift and shift)
  2. Replatform
  3. Re-architect and rebuild

Pre-modernization assessment and learning

Before you modernize, you must prepare. The first step is assess your applications and their dependencies to determine which applications are suitable to modernize and which ones cannot change or move (typically because of legacy-related or regulatory reasons). For more information, see Migration to Google Cloud: Assessing and discovering your workloads.

In parallel to this assessment, your team needs to learn about the capabilities of the cloud. Google Cloud offers certifications, technical guides, and Windows- and .NET-specific codelabs that can help speed up the learning process.

After you identify what applications to modernize, you can begin migrating your conventional applications to the cloud as-is or with minimal changes to the application code or configuration.

Phase 1: Rehost in the cloud

The primary goal of this first phase is to transfer the burden of server management from your on-premises resources to the cloud infrastructure. In this phase, you ensure that your infrastructure is cloud-ready so that you can optimize it for the cloud in later phases.

Manual migration versus tool-based migration

A lift and shift of Windows-based .NET Framework applications typically starts by moving on-premises Windows Server and SQL Server instances to Compute Engine virtual machine (VM) instances. You can perform this process manually or automate it with the help of a migration tool.

In a manual migration, you can use Compute Engine Windows Server images to start instances. Google Cloud Marketplace also has solutions ready to deploy to Compute Engine, such as the ASP.NET Framework solution to get a Windows Server VM that includes IIS, SQL Express, and ASP.NET.

Similarly, you can start SQL Server instances from SQL Server images, or you can go directly to a more managed solution—Cloud SQL for SQL Server.

Google Cloud also offers migration tools such as Migrate to Virtual Machines or VMware Engine to help you move on-premises VMware VMs to a VMware environment in Google Cloud.

After you configure the VMs, you typically create custom VM images so that you can recreate new instances on demand. This step is also important for instance templates, which are discussed later in this document.

If you need domain services in the cloud, you can deploy a Fault-tolerant Microsoft Active Directory environment on Compute Engine with a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) or directly go to Managed Service for Microsoft Active Directory.

On-premises and cloud connectivity

As you migrate VMs to the cloud, it's not uncommon to keep some workloads on-premises—for example, when you have applications that require legacy hardware or software, or when you need to meet compliance and local regulatory requirements. You need a VPN or an interconnect solution to securely connect on-premises and cloud resources. For various ways to create and manage this connection, as well as other implications of running hybrid-cloud and on-premises workloads, see Migration to Google Cloud: Building your foundation.

Initial benefits

At the end of Phase 1, you have basic infrastructure running in the cloud, which provides benefits such as the following:

  • Cost optimizations. You can create a custom machine type (CPU, memory, and storage) and pay for what you use; start and stop VMs and disaster recovery environments at will and only pay when they are running; and get rightsizing recommendations before migration.
  • Increased operational efficiency. You can attach persistent disks to VMs and create snapshots for simplified backup and restore.
  • Increased reliability. You no longer need to schedule maintenance windows because of the live migration feature.

These initial benefits are useful, but more benefits are unlocked when you start optimizing for the cloud.

Phase 2: Replatform

When you replatform, you optimize your application by upgrading parts of the application's components—such as its database, caching layer, or storage system—without changing the application's architecture and with minimal changes to the codebase. The goal of Phase 2 is to start using cloud features for better management, resilience, scalability, and elasticity of your application without significantly restructuring it or leaving the VM environment.

Take advantage of Compute Engine

Compute Engine provides some standard features that are useful to explore. For example, you can use instance templates in Compute Engine to create templates from existing VM configurations. Instance groups are a fleet of identical VMs that lets you efficiently scale your application's performance and redundancy. Beyond simple load-balancing and redundancy, managed instance groups have scalability features like autoscaling, high availability features like autohealing, regional deployments, and safety features like auto-updating.

With these features, you can stay in the VM world but increase the resiliency, redundancy, and availability of your applications without needing to restructure your application completely.

Look for in-place replacements

As you move your application to the cloud, you need to look for opportunities to replace your hosted infrastructure with managed cloud options from Google and third-party partners on Cloud Marketplace, including the following:

  • Cloud SQL instead of self-hosted SQL Server, MySQL, or Postgres. Cloud SQL lets you focus on managing the database instead of managing the infrastructure (such as patching database VMs for security or managing backups) with the added benefit of removing the requirement for a Windows license.
  • Managed Service for Microsoft Active Directory instead of self-hosted Active Directory.
  • Memorystore instead of self-hosted Redis instances.

These replacements should require no code changes and only minimal configuration changes, and they have the advantages of minimal management, enhanced security, and scalability.

First steps with Windows containers

After you optimize basic functions for the cloud, you can begin the move from VMs to containers.

A container is a lightweight package that contains an application and all its dependencies. Compared to running your application directly on a VM, containers let you run your applications in various environments and in a more consistent, predictable, and efficient way (especially when you run multiple containers on the same host). The ecosystem around containers (such as Kubernetes, Istio, and Knative) also provides a number of management, resilience, and monitoring features that can further accelerate your application's transformation from a single monolith to a set of focused microservices.

For some time, containerization was a Linux-only feature. Windows applications could not benefit from containers. That changed with Windows containers and their subsequent support in Kubernetes and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).

Windows containers are an option if you don't want to migrate .NET Framework applications to .NET but still want the benefits of containers (such as agility, portability, and control). You need to choose the right OS to target depending on the .NET Framework version, and you need to remember that not all the Windows stack is supported on Windows containers. For the limitations of this approach and alternatives, see .NET and Linux containers later in this document.

After you containerize your .NET Framework application into a Windows container, we recommend that you run it in a Kubernetes cluster. Kubernetes provides standard features such as detecting when a container Pod is down and recreating it, autoscaling Pods, automated rollouts or rollbacks, and health checks. GKE adds features such as cluster autoscaling, regional clusters, highly available control planes, and hybrid and multi-cloud support with GKE Enterprise. If you decide to use GKE or GKE Enterprise, you can use Migrate to Containers to simplify and accelerate the migration of Windows VMs to containers. Migrate to Containers automates the extraction of applications from VMs into containers without requiring you to rewrite or re-architect applications.

Although you can realize many benefits by using the right features in Compute Engine, moving to containers and GKE helps you fully use your VMs by packing multiple Pods onto the same VMs. This strategy potentially results in fewer VMs and lower Windows licensing costs.

Managing both Windows and Linux containers declaratively with Kubernetes and GKE can also streamline your infrastructure management. With containerization in place, your team is prepared for the next phase of modernization.

Phase 3: Re-architect and rebuild

Replatforming is only the start toward fully benefiting from the cloud. Transforming your architecture to a cloud-based platform offers several advantages, such as the following:

The move toward managed services

As you start rewriting parts of your application, we recommend that you begin to move from hosted services to managed services. For example, you might use the following:

Although you need additional code to integrate your application with these services, it's a worthwhile investment, because you are shifting the burden of platform management to Google Cloud. Google Cloud Libraries for .NET, Tools for Visual Studio, and Cloud Code for Visual Studio Code can help you stay in the .NET ecosystem and tools while you integrate with these services.

Managed services can also support operations for your application. You can store your application logs in Cloud Logging and send your application metrics to Cloud Monitoring, where you can build dashboards with server and application metrics. Google Cloud offers .NET client libraries for Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, and Cloud Trace.

.NET and Linux containers

If your application is a legacy .NET Framework application that runs only on Windows, you might be tempted to keep it running on a Windows server on Compute Engine or in a Windows Server container on GKE. Although this approach might work in the short term, it can severely limit you in the long term. Windows comes with licensing fees and an overall larger resource footprint than Linux, and these factors can result in a higher cost of ownership in the long term.

One of the most important aspects of .NET is that it's multi-platform. You can containerize a .NET application into a Linux container. Linux containers are more lightweight than Windows containers, and they run on more platforms more efficiently. This factor creates deployment options for .NET applications and lets you break free from dependency on Windows and the licensing costs associated with it.

Porting .NET Framework applications to .NET

A good way to begin moving toward .NET is to read Overview of porting from .NET Framework to .NET. Tools such as .NET Portability Analyzer and Platform compatibility analyzer can help you determine if assemblies and APIs are portable. Other porting tools such as dotnet try-convert can be helpful.

External tools can help you identify compatibility issues and decide what components to migrate first. Eventually, you need to create .NET projects, gradually move your .NET Framework code to the new project, and fix any incompatibilities along the way. Before you port your code, it's crucial to put tests in place and then test your functionality after porting. We recommend that you use A/B testing to test old and new code. With A/B testing, you can keep your legacy application running while directing some of your users to the new application. This approach lets you test the outputs, scalability, and resilience of the new application. To assist with A/B testing, Google Cloud offers load-balancing solutions such as global external Application Load Balancer.

Cultural transformation

The transformation from .NET Framework and Windows servers to .NET and Linux containers is not merely technical. This shift requires a cultural transformation in your organization. Staff who might be used to Windows-only environments need to adapt to multi-platform environments. This cultural transformation requires time and budget to train in .NET, Linux, and container tools such as Docker and Kubernetes. However, a transformation from a Windows-only to a multi-platform organization lets you access a larger set of tools and skills.

Monolith decomposition

The move from .NET Framework to .NET can raise several questions, including the following:

  • Do you rewrite your whole application in .NET?
  • Do you break your application into smaller services and write those in .NET?
  • Do you only write new services in .NET?

As you consider these questions, account for the benefits, time, and cost associated with each approach. It's good to have a balanced approach where you don't rewrite everything all at once. Instead, you can write new services in .NET and break your existing monolith into smaller services in .NET as opportunity arises. As you plan, the following documents can help:

Deployment options for .NET containers

As Deploying .NET apps on Google Cloud states, you have different options for deploying .NET containers on Google Cloud. As you deconstruct your monolithic application to microservices, you might decide to use more than one hosting solution, depending on the architecture and design of your microservices.

Answering the following questions can help you decide the best hosting strategy:

  • What triggers your application? All hosting solutions are suitable for standard HTTP(S), but if your protocol is TCP/UDP or a proprietary protocol, GKE might be your only option.
  • Does your application require specific hardware? Cloud Run offers a reasonable but limited amount of RAM and CPU for each request. Cloud Run for Anthos offers further customization options such as GPU, more memory, and disk space.
  • What are your scaling expectations? If your application has periods of inactivity, serverless solutions such as Cloud Run can offer the option to scale down to zero.
  • How important is latency and how tolerant is your application to cold starts? If tolerance to cold starts is low, you need to consider one of the following options:

We recommend that you read the documentation for each hosting environment to get familiar with its capabilities, strengths and weaknesses, and pricing model.

As a general rule, if you want to create microservices that serve HTTP requests, you need to deploy to Cloud Run when possible and fall back to GKE if you want to stay in the Kubernetes ecosystem or require more customization options. GKE is also the default choice if you have a long-running process, such as a process that listens on a queue, or an application that uses protocols other than HTTP(S).

Cloud Functions is also a good serverless deployment option, but it is not discussed here, because Cloud Run provides most of the features provided by Cloud Functions, and Cloud Functions does not support every version of .NET.

Kubernetes and GKE

If you want to run in a container-optimized environment, that approach likely involves Kubernetes and its managed version, GKE. Kubernetes and GKE a